|
UNITED SERVICE INSTITUTION OF
INDIA
GOLD MEDAL ESSAY COMPETITION – 2008
Group ‘A’: Open to All Officers
PRINCIPLES OF WAR-NEED FOR RE-EVALUATION IN
CONTEXT OF THE INDIAN EXPERIENCE
1. Kautilya’s Arthashastra is the oldest treatise known to exist, which throws
some light on ancient India’s strategic culture. The ‘principles of war’ as
known today can be traced back to Sun Tzu’s ‘The Art of War’, written over 2000
years ago. Carl Von Clausewitz, a Prussian General who is well known for his
work ‘On War’ wrote a memorandum for the military instruction of the Prussian
Crown Prince during 1810 - 1812 which was published as ‘The Most Important
Principles for the Conduct Of War’. Thereafter, we have Marshal Foch who held
forth that a theory of war starts from a number of principles and then went on
to enunciate a few principles (of war). After the First World War, Major General
JFC Fuller enunciated a set of eight principles and these were accepted and
included in the British Field Service Regulations 1920. These eight principles
remained in vogue through the intervening years and during World War II. In
1946, Field Marshal Montgomery added two more principles, morale and
administration. ‘Political Mobilisation’is a principle of war enunciated by
China and no other country. After Independence, ten ‘principles of war’ came to
be accepted by the Indian Armed Forces and continue to be so till today. These
are: Selection and Maintenances of Aim, Offensive Action, Concentration of
Force, Economy of Effort, Flexibility, Cooperation, Security, Surprise,
Administration and Maintenance of Morale.
2. The ‘principles of war’ as generally accepted today were evolved as a result
of the experience gained by the commanders during the First and the Second World
Wars. The Second World War involved maneuvers by large forces and was spread
across many countries and even continents. In terms of the size of the forces
involved, the spaces over which battles were fought, technologies used and the
intensity of operations, the Second World War was major landmark in the history
of conventional warfare In recent years, the nature of conflict has undergone
transformation. Asymmetric was have become common. The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan
and Lebanon are classic examples of this change. Nuclear weapons have added yet
another dimension to warfare. The spectrum of conflict today ranges from
sub-conventional to conventional and to conventional with a nuclear overhang.
3. Since Independence, Indian Armed Forces have been involved in a number of
wars and conflicts, in define of India’s sovereignty and integrity. There have
been exceptions like the Sri Lankan experience and the operation undertaken in
support of the Maldives Government in 1995. In addition to conventional wars,
Indian Army has been constantly engaged in low intensity conflicts since the
early 1960s. All these wars and conflicts have generated a wealth of experience,
which is still to be properly evaluated.
(a) How effective has been the application of these ‘principles of war’ in
India’s major wars since Independence; viz, 1962, 1965, 1971 and 1999 Kargil War
? The Sri Lankan experience may also merit consideration.
(b) Applicability in view the nature and full spectrum of conflict, including
low intensity conflicts/proxy wars and a conventional war with a nuclear
overhang.
5. Keeping in view the nature of wars and conflicts that India may face in the
foreseeable future, what changes if any, to the set of ten principles, as
accepted today, are recommended? Do we need a separate or an additional set of
principles for low intensity conflict/ In the Indian context, are there any
principles, which should have an overarching importance over the rest?
Group ‘B’: Open to All Officers upto 10 years of Service
STRESS MANAGEMENT IN THE ARMED FORCES
1. In the recent past, there have been a number of cases of suicides and
fratricide in the Indian Army. These cases would indicate that the level of
stress went beyond the individual’s threshold and he/she felt that the extreme
step was the only course open. Two points emerge from such incidents. Firstly,
the unit did not become aware or take note of the indicators that may have been
forthcoming. Secondly, the individual did not feel confident that he/she could
share his/her concerns with colleagues or those in authority before taking the
extreme step. Both causes require introspection by the System.
2. Stress as a phenomenon is inherent in any individual’s life and work
environment. Degrees may vary. Life in the Armed Forces, due to the nature of
work and hazardous environment would seem to be more stressful as compared to
other professions or walks of life. Prolonged employment in counter insurgency
operations, deployment in isolated posts and inhospitable terrain, frequent
moves resulting in unsettled family life, separation from family for long
periods are just some of the factors which act as stress multipliers. Then there
are stresses caused by the pyramidal structure of the Armed Forces, i.e
promotions and peer completion.
3. there are societal factors as well, which also generate stress. The joint
family system has broken down. As a result, the families of military personnel
have to live by themselves quite frequently during service. Individual
aspirations have risen. There is an understandable desire to provide good
education to children and for material acquisitions to improve quality of life.
From the career point of view and to sustain improved quality of life, wives are
increasingly taking up jobs, which leaves little time for the family and in some
cases, due to the nature of employment; the families are split in different
locations. To this must be added the generally unsympathetic attitude of the
civil administration in resolving the problems faced by the Armed Forces
personnel.
4. An environment totally free from stress does not exist anywhere. The
individual needs organisationl support to overcome stress related problems, as
and when they occur. An organisation like the Armed Forces must evolve
institutional mechanisms to minimise or mitigate stress related issues amongst
its rank and file.
5. Keeping the above in view, the easy should generally address the following
issues:-
(a) Impact of the socio-economic changes in society upon the Armed Forces
personnel.
(b) What changes, including institutional measures, can be brought about in the
work environment, without diluting values, ethos and efficiency, to redrew
stress in Service life.
(c) Role of leadership at various levels in mitigating or coping with stress in
the Armed Forces.
(d) Also, suggest measures required to be taken by the Government and its
institutions down to the district / block / panchayat levels to ameliorate the
condition of the Armed Forces personnel and their families which would reduce
stress due to societal factors.
UNITED SERVICE INSTITUTION OF INDIA
GOLD MEDAL ESSAY COMPETITION – 2008
RULES
1. Competition Group ‘A’ is open to all commissioned officers of the Armed
Forces of India, officers of the Territorial Army and the Senior Division of
National Cadet Corps, and Gazettdd Officers of the Civil Administration in India
including retired officers.
2. Competition Group ‘B’ is restricted to officers upto 10 years service.
3. Essay may vary in length between 3,000 to 5,000 words. The world length
should be shown in brackets at the end of essay. Entries violating the length
are liable to be rejected.
4. Essay should be typed on one side of the paper in double space and should be
submitted in TRIPLICATE
5. Entries will be strictly ANONYMOUS. No detail pertaining to the officer is to
be mentioned on the essay or in the covering letter. The officer is to select a
MOTTO and type it on all copies of the first page of his essay. One sealed
enveloped is to accompany the essay with a paper indicating the MOTTO, personal
number, rank, name, date of commission, unit, address and e-mail written on it.
On the outside of the envelope, only the MOTTO is to be written. These envelopes
will be opened during the USI Council meeting, after the judges have given their
decision.
6. the easy must be an officer's personal and original effort without
plagiarism and cup-paste job. Jointly written essay are not accepted.
7. Three judges chosen by the USE ill adjudicate. Marks will be given on the
basis of the following: (a) The extent to which the contribution throws fresh light on the subject.
(b) Whether in the whole or in large part it is in a form suitable for
publication.
(c) Understanding of the subject.
(d) Thought, logic, development of theme.
(e) Language / expression.
8. The award of the judges will be final. They may recommend the Gold Medal to
the winners and/or a cash prize of Rs. 10,000/- as well as cash prize to the
runners-up of Rs. 5,000/-. The names of the winners of the essay competition
will be published in the USI Journal. Winning Essay found suitable in each Group
will be published in the USI Journal and and additional sum of Rs, 5,000 will be
given on publication.
9. The Institution reserves the right not to make an award, if none of the
essays submitted are of a standard which the judges consider adequate. Cases of
plagiarism will invite disqualification.
10. Copyright of all essays submitted will be reserved by the United Service
Institution of India.
11. All essays should be sent to the Director, United Service Institution of
India, Rao Tula Ram Marg, Post Bag No. 8 Vasant Vihar PO, New Delhi – 110 057,
(in triplicate) latest by 15 September 2008. The envelopes should be marked
as follows:
(a) OPEN TO ALL OFFICERS Essay Competition
Group ‘A’
(c) OPEN TO OFFICERS UPTO Essay Competition
10 YEARS OF SERVICE Group ‘B’
STYLE SHEET
1. General
(a) All diagrams, charts and graphs should be referred to as Figures and
consecutively numbered. Tables should carry only essential data and should
complement the text rather than repeat what has already been said. They should
carry a short title, be numbered and carry the source at the bottom.
(b) The paper should have center, group, paragraph and sub-paragraph headings to
make it more reader-friendly.
(c) Use British spellings.
(d) Write dates by begging with the day followed by the month and the year (e.g.
11 September 2006).
(e) In the text, write numbers in words till the number nine and then in
numerals (e.g. two, four, nine; then 10, 11, 12 and so on).
(f) write ‘per cent’ and not % or percent.
(g) Acronyms and abbreviations should carry the full from at the first mention
with the acronym in bracket; and thereafter the abbreviated version.
(h) Names of books, journals, newspapers and foreign terms in the body of the
text should appear in italics, e.g.; Asian Security in the 21st Centre’ Strategic
Analysis’ The Hindu.
(i) While referring to currency, use Rs, 2,000/- crores, not 2000 crores of
rupees. Similarly, $ 8.5 million, not 8.5 million dollars.
2. References / Endnotes
(a) It is desirable that the author furnishes complete details of the
books/journals referred to in the article as end notes. This includes full name
of writer of article or book referred to, title of book/article, journal in
which published 9in case of articles); issue details, and page numbers. Besides
end notes, if the author so desires, bibliography may also be included.
(b) While referring to a book, follow the example below:- Lt Gen CK Kapur,
Chinese Military Modernisation, (New Delhi : Mansas Publications, 2003), pp.
17-18.
(c) While referring to an article in a journal, follow the example below:-
Lt Cdr Neeraj Amphorae, “Pratap Singh of the Indian Legion”. The Journal of the
United Service Institution of India, Vol. CXXXIV No. 556, p.283
(d) While referring to a website, follow the example below: “Escalation Control
in a Nuclear Environment”, Report of a Senior organized by the Institute of
Peace and Conflict Sutu dies on 17 Novembers 2004 at New Delhi. www.ipcs.org.
Accessed on 08 February 2005.
(e) if two successive citations/references refer to the same source, use Ibid.
(f) If the same reference is to be cited after a few other references or
citations, write the name of the author followed by the citation number e.g:
Imran Khan, note 2.
|