|
CNS TROPHY FOR BEST HRD PRACTICES
INTRODUCTION : In 1998, CNS desired to institute measures for uplifting the
civilian personnel in their output and also welfare schemes as to keep the
civilian workforce fully motivated and productivity oriented to ensure the
flying of Naval Flag always high. The proposal for instituting CNS Trophy for
best HRD practices was forwarded to Command Headquarters and Dockyards in Jul 98
for taking their suggestions prior to issuance of final order. Finally, CNS
approved introduction of CNS Trophy for excellence in HRD functions amongst the
industrial units of the Navy on 30 Dec 98, starting from the year 98-99. The
details of winners are as below:-
REVISION OF FORMAT FOR MAPPING PARAMETERS : The format for mapping of HRD
parameters was considered to be too detailed and needed considerable
documentation. In this context, it was decided to relook at the proforma
promulgated in order to make it user friendly and practical. During the process
of revision of proforma the trophy could not be awarded during the years 2002-03
and 2003-04.
In 2005, the revised format for mapping units performance was issued to bring
about more objectivity and transparency in the system of evaluating the HRD
parameters for award of the ‘CNS Trophy for Best HRD Practices’ covering the all
important issues in the following three parts:
|
Sl.No. |
Subjects |
Areas covered |
| (a) |
Competency Building
|
Training, Job Rotation, Team Building,
Human Resource Information System (HRMS) |
| (b) |
Enhancing Commitment |
Counselling, Rewards & Incentives, Quality of Work
Life, Participative Management |
| (c) |
Culture Building |
Communication, Social Activities, Developing & Motivating
Line Managers |
INTRODUCTION OF TWO TROPHIES : Two trophies one each for Major and Minor
Industrial Establishments were introduced from the year 2004-05. The
Establishments with 750 civilian personnel and above would be considered Major
Establishment and others Minor.
METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATION : Evaluation process is undertaken in two stages (i)
By Command HQs (ii) By IHQ MoD(Navy).
(a) The Commands would appoint a Board of Officers to evaluate the Units in
their jurisdiction and select one Major and one Minor Unit and forward their
recommendation to IHQ MoD(Navy). HQ Andaman Nicobar Command would forward the
name of only best Minor Unit to IHQ MoD(Navy).
(b) IHQ MoD(Navy) would appoint a Board of Officers to evaluate the total
projections received from the Commands of 3 Major and 4 Minor Establishments for
selecting the best major and minor establishment for award of Trophy.
(c) The methodology that would be applied for the evaluation of documentation
and physical verification would be decided upon the Board President.
(d) After analysis of the data and physical verification of the documents, the
Board submits it recommendations for CNS approval.
|